[pacman-dev] libalpm data structures

[Nagy Gabor]

> If I could make a suggestion: if it were up to me, I'd do 3. first, as
> it bugs me the most.
But my preferred solution of 3. depends on my pending patches. So I'm waiting
for you patiently ;-) And 3. needs some deeper changes (the code must be almost
ready for the universal transaction, because I'd prefer upgrade and remove list
instead of pmsyncpkg_t). And I'm a bit unsure:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009448.html / "so
the real question is: do we need this glue?" + 1.
Bye


----------------------------------------------------
SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/