On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:38:45PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Well, I'll be! If it's not a pointer, than it IS redundant. Were it a > pointer though, the first case would fail and the second call would be > made... > I don't think so, it's a &&. Anyway, forget it, I see that Dan applied Nagy's patch, so it's alright. I was just curious.