[pacman-dev] pacman -S db/provision

Nagy Gabor ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu
Wed Jul 2 10:17:02 EDT 2008

> Maybe you can just drop this behavior for now, because this is indeed
> inconsistent with resolvedeps. Then if we want to reintroduce some
> kind of handling of multiple satisfiers in the future, it should be
> done for both explicit targets (which is currently done in frontend)
> and dependency resolving (in backend).

I've just found the following: '/' handling is done in backend
(sync_addtarget), so pacman -S db/sh won't do the expected operation,
because the provision handling is done in front-end. Is this OK?


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list