[pacman-dev] [PATCH] remove_addtarget rework (in front-end)

[Nagy Gabor]

> Please use pm_printf with an applicable level- INFO perhaps?
We have no INFO level, which is a bit funny, indeed (we simply use
WARNING from back-end in these cases). So I don't know what to do here.
When I wrote this patch, I just looked around in sync.c and I found a
lot of pure printf there. So we may want to introduce PM_LOG_INFO in
separate commit, and replace printfs to pm_printf in front-end. Is this
OK or did I misinterpret something?

I just rewrote the 2 remaining commit message for now, and added -R
group pactest.

Bye