[pacman-dev] FS#7982 - patch to makepkg to allow PKGBUILDs building more than one package
Allan McRae
mcrae_allan at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 16 10:35:33 EDT 2008
I have been thinking about this some more and my head is beginning to
hurt...
> + backup_o=$backup
> + conflicts_o=$conflicts
> + depends_o=$depends
> + groups_o=$groups
> + install_o=$install
> + license_o=$license
> + pkgdesc_o=$pkgdesc
> + pkgname_o=$pkgname
> + pkgver_o=$pkgver
> + provides_o=$provides
> + replaces_o=$replaces
> + url_o=$url
>
Why would we need to change license, pkgver and url? This is for
splitting packages that come in a single source file... Otherwise you
make two PKGBUILDs. Can anyone give me a possible reason for changing
these. I'm not sure about groups but there might be some reason to
change that. I can think of reasons to change the options array so that
should be included. Should we allow varying pkgrels between the split
packages?
I really think we need to take a big step back here. What we really
need is to have a prototype PKGBUILD for a split package that is
relatively agreed upon. As I said in other emails there are multiple
ways to do this and one needs to be chosen. Once the decisions have
been made about the approach to take, and a naming scheme for
functions/variables, then we can look at patches. At the moment the
patches seem without a defined goal (at least to me).
Allan
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list