[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add information on version comparison to manpages

Nagy Gabor ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu
Fri Jun 20 04:46:49 EDT 2008


> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org>
> ---
>  doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt |    3 ++-
>  doc/pacman.8.txt   |    8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
> index b90d67a..0b1ce64 100644
> --- a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
> +++ b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
> @@ -214,7 +214,8 @@ similar to `$_basekernver`.
>  		Force the package to be upgraded by a pacman system
> upgrade operation, even if the version number would normally not
> trigger such an upgrade. This is useful when the version numbering
> scheme
> -		of a package changes (or is alphanumeric).
> +		of a package changes (or is alphanumeric). See
> linkman:pacman[8] for
> +		more infomation on version comparisons.
>  
>  
>  build() Function
> diff --git a/doc/pacman.8.txt b/doc/pacman.8.txt
> index 5594ac6..08764de 100644
> --- a/doc/pacman.8.txt
> +++ b/doc/pacman.8.txt
> @@ -61,7 +61,13 @@ provide the same functionality as foo will be
> searched for. If any package is found, it will be installed.
>  +
>  You can also use `pacman -Su` to upgrade all packages that are out
> of date. See -<<SO,Sync Options>> below.
> +<<SO,Sync Options>> below. When upgrading, pacman performs version
> comparison +to determine which packages need upgrading. This behavior
> operates as follows: +
> +  Alphanumeric:
> +    1.0 < 1.0a < 1.0alpha < 1.0b < 1.0beta < 1.0p < 1.0pre < 1.0rc

Sorry guys, I don't like this at all. I think the old behavior was
better. And I don't see the reason of this change. We have many
packages with alphanumeric version atm: a2ps-4.13c-1,
aalib-1.4rc5-1, ... and I'm pretty sure that the expected behavior is
that aalib-1.4 should upgrade aalib-1.4rc5-1, like earlier.

Bye




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list