[pacman-dev] uncompressed man pages
Dan McGee
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 18:57:19 EDT 2008
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 05:50:49PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > the tidy_install makepkg function is composed of 5 parts :
> > > > 1) Removing info/doc controlled by docs option
> > > > 2) compressing man pages
> > > > 3) stripping debugging symbols controlled by strip
> > > > 4) removing libtool controlled by libtool
> > > > 5) removing empty directories controlled by emptydirs
> > > >
> > > > So as you can see, all steps can be enabled / disabled with an option except
> > > > step 2)
> > > > It turns out it would be useful to control that too. For example, the zsh
> > > > package has a special zshall man page that includes all others, but this only
> > > > works with uncompressed man page. Working around this automatic makepkg
> > > > compression is really awful and ugly :
> > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4580
> > > >
> > > > So would it be acceptable to add a "compress" option or something?
> > >
> > > +1 from me when you put it this way. Throw it in the right array, make
> > > the default compress, and off we go.
> >
> > I agree too, makes a lot of sense. But if the option were actually
> > "compress", then it might be confusing (maybe someone expects
> > !compress to output an uncompressed tar?).
> >
>
> Ok what about compressman ?
> It doesn't sound very nice, but it's more explicit, and I wanted to try keep
> it small like the others :)
zipman ?
-Dan
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list