[pacman-dev] Libalpm direction and usage by others

Miklos Vajna vmiklos at frugalware.org
Thu Mar 27 19:07:12 EDT 2008

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:11:19PM +0100, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's true, but hmm.. Even though I don't know python well, it seems 
> many programmers like it and are efficient with it, so it would probably 
> be more practical from that point of view.

don't get me wrong, i love python. but i would never write pacman in a
scripting language. if you think c is too lowlevel, then write it in
c++, haskell or whatever you want, as long as you can compile it
statically so even a glibc upgrade won't be able to kill it :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20080328/4c7524c3/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list