[pacman-dev] Libalpm direction and usage by others
vmiklos at frugalware.org
Fri Mar 28 07:37:16 EDT 2008
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:28:52PM -0400, Loui <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been thinking about libalpm recently since I started maintaining
> aurbuild. I haven't looked at any of the code of libalpm (yet).
> Yes, I have heard about how it's ugly and so on. I've seen all the
> stalled attempts at creating python bindings as well.
fwiw, there were working python bindings (and libpacman still has ones),
but then problem with it was it violated KISS, so it was removed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the pacman-dev