[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Fixed some innacuracies in the pactest README

Xavier shiningxc at gmail.com
Wed Jan 14 15:34:45 EST 2009

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Bryan Ischo
<bji-keyword-pacman.3644cb at www.ischo.com> wrote:
> OK, I can modify my patch according to this feedback.
> What is the best way to do this?  Should I make a new patch assuming that my
> patch 1 was accepted and applied?  Or should I make a replacement patch 1
> and send that out on the assumption that my other patch will not be applied?

When we give feedbacks on patches on the ML, we always expect you to
resubmit fixed patches. And not fix on patches.
For example, patch 5/5 is a fix of patch 2/5 so that's not perfect.

Otherwise about your patchset, I am still not convinced that this is
the smallest and best implementation possible. I would say the patches
themselves are readable and well written, with good comments, etc. But
I would still like to give more thinking to it and to explore other
alternative ways.
Last thing, Nagy seems to have given these patches a closer look, and
he did a lot of good work on that deps.c file in my opinion, so I
would like to know his overall feeling about this patchset now 8)

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list