[pacman-dev] Package signing again....

[unohu]

IMHO it is a lack of direction rather than lack of man power. If there is a
correct road map/consensus of what/how we want to implement, i am sure there
are few persons here(including me) who would like to see this implemented
and are ready to work on this.

I understand that the current pacman devs are quite busy at the moment with
next 3.3 release, but if they can come up with a higher level design of what
needs to be implemented, we can start working on the boring part of coding
and other details :) .

This will also remove the uncertainty of whether the patches will get
accepted or will need a complete rework after spending a lot of time on
this.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Gerhard Brauer <gerbra at archlinux.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> i would like to push this again, as a remainder...
> Maybe there are now more pacman Devs with the time to continue the work
> on GPG signed packages.
> We have the threads in 12/2008 here:
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-December/007761.html
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-December/007808.html
>
> I'd have the impression we're on a good way there - but lack of man
> power...
>
> Regards
>        Gerhard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pacman-dev mailing list
> pacman-dev at archlinux.org
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
>