[pacman-dev] Fetch callback patch, take 2

[Dario Freddi]

In data sabato 18 luglio 2009 12:25:19, Xavier ha scritto:
>
> Do you realize your patch is the first one Xilon submitted :
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-February/008198.html

No, I didn't know it, or better I didn't remember of it (and that was a long, 
long time ago, so I think it's quite understandable)

>
> Then Aaron made the suggestion to move xfercommand handling to pacman
> frontend, and to use fetch callback to register it.
> Why did you revert this change, why is it problematic for you?
> And why didn't you say anything back then?

It's not problematic, I tried to simplify the patch since Sebastian's one 
seemed not to get in for some reason. I'm completely ok both ways, I think it 
boils down to personal preferences, I only care about the damn fetch callback 
getting in. If you prefer having xfercommand handled that way, Sebastian's 
patch will work more than fine.


-- 
-------------------

Dario Freddi
KDE Developer
GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20090718/b1cd6efd/attachment.pgp>