[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/2] makepkg: move pacman calls to a function
allan at archlinux.org
Tue Nov 10 17:28:34 EST 2009
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Cedric Staniewski <cedric at gmx.ca> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Staniewski <cedric at gmx.ca>
> Seems pretty reasonable to me; Allan, is this OK?
I have been thinking about this and its companion patch. I like the
refactoring of the pacman call into the function but dislike not
replacing the "pacman -T" call with it.
If there is a config option for setting the "pacman" binary, and I have
program that replaces pacman (e.g. the one based on the python alpm
wrapper should work), then I should not need pacman on my system at all.
So I prefer the original version where the "pacman -T" call was replaced
More information about the pacman-dev