[pacman-dev] Why alpm_list.h?
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Fri Apr 2 22:46:38 CEST 2010
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy <ml+pacman at barfooze.de> wrote:
> since I started to dig into pacman's code, I've also started to wonder why
> exactly libalpm reinvents the wheel by using it's own list implementation
> rather than sys/queue.h (see QUEUE(3) for details). Is it for backwards
> compatibility or what are the exact reasons to handle it this way?
Things I can think of off the top of my head, although I do not know
the thinking process way back when:
1. It isn't POSIX
2. I don't see any sort of search/sort/merge functionality, which we
use for some very key pieces of code
3. It seems woefully unrich in some features and it isn't clear how to extend it
More information about the pacman-dev