[pacman-dev] Release plans [phonon/qt issue]

Dan McGee dpmcgee at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 06:53:09 CEST 2010

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 25/04/10 00:59, Nagy Gabor wrote:
>>> On 24/04/10 02:04, Nagy Gabor wrote:
>>>>> Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
>>>> The phonon/qt issue:
>>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010429.html
>>>> And I revoke my reply. :-) Xavier and I discussed this issue on irc,
>>>> and neither of us could come up with a perfect solution. So we should
>>>> discuss what to do.
>>> Given there is no patch or idea how to patch yet, lets not make this a
>>> blocker...  :)
>> You should open the link I gave. :-P
>> That patch should fix sync405.py pactest (that I've just sent to this
>> ML), including all -Su related problems, so that should cover the most
>> "real" issues. The second pactest is tricky, and that seems quite hard
>> to fix without notable slow-down (there the new qt is pulled by an other
>> package; this cannot happen with -Su).
>> So I think we should just accept that patch with minor modifications.
>> Xavier?
> Ah...  I skimmed over your "I revoke my reply" comment. :P
> That patch (with the needed modifications) is better than nothing so I would
> be in favour of including it.

I would be too...if Xavier says yes as well. :) The pactest addition
patch went in tonight so we should see this patch flip one of those to


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list