[pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?
Nagy Gabor
ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu
Wed Feb 3 11:50:08 EST 2010
> Finally, this would prevent proper upgrades to partially complete
> rebuilds. That is fine for some users who would like such things, but
> the people doing and testing a rebuild would have issues. I upgraded
> the libpng/libjpeg rebuild packages while there were still several
> packages needing to be rebuilt for my system. With this patch, I would
> be required to do an incredibly stupid "pacman -Syud".
I can't see any problem here. If you are going to break some
dependencies on your system, pacman should disallow that, like with
"regular" dependencies. This is exactly our goal: To avoid system
breakage with partial updates.
Packagers should know what they are doing... Moreover, I can also
support adding some more sophisticated dependency switches (maybe
hidden from end-users), if needed. (Personally, I don't like that I
can't turn on resolvedeps with -d. Moreover, in many cases it is worth
distinguishing target_pkg->foo broken dependencies from local_pkg->foo
broken [reverse]deps.)
Bye
------------------------------------------------------
SZTE Egyetemi Konyvtar - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu
This message was sent using IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list