[pacman-dev] BUG and PATCH: 'handle' not null after alpm_release()

[Dario Freddi]

On Tuesday 19 January 2010 15:01:06 Dan McGee wrote:
> The reason we don't do the "third party library friendly" stuff?
> Because we get next to zero traffic on the mailing list from you guys.
> Seriously, this is the first message from someone in quite some time,
> and all the time we pose questions to the ML asking about a API change
> and get zero responses.
> 

This is not true _at all_. The last mail about a significant API change 
(unless I missed something, which might be) was the one on the download 
callbacks where I shared many thoughts, and I was probably the most active 
poster in the thread.

-- 
-------------------

Dario Freddi
KDE Developer
GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20100121/e48ff317/attachment.bin>