[pacman-dev] [arch-dev] [signoff] openssl 1.0.0a
allan at archlinux.org
Tue Jun 1 20:57:18 EDT 2010
On 02/06/10 10:43, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:12:45 +1000, Allan McRae<allan at archlinux.org>
>> vercmp and pacman include the same source file for comparisons so should
>> be fine.
>> There might have been a change a while back (3.2 I think) when there
>> were heaps of discussions about version numbers and how they are sorted.
>> At the moment the scheme is the same as what rpm uses (except rpm has
>> epochs to deal with cases like this).
> Btw: is this a bug in vercmp?
> [pierre at opteron ~]$ vercmp 1.0.0a 1.0.0.a
> [pierre at opteron ~]$ vercmp 1.0.0 1.0.0.a
> [pierre at opteron ~]$ vercmp 1.0.0 1.0.0a
> If both versions are equal why aren't they if compared with others?
Certainly looks like a bug to me. Forwarding to pacman-dev
More information about the pacman-dev