[pacman-dev] More thought about signature implementation

Denis A. Altoé Falqueto denisfalqueto at gmail.com
Sat Jun 19 10:01:02 EDT 2010

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly you're worried about a non-issue here. The size of the DBs is
> fine before and after, and we already serve up 98% of the same info
> every time someone downloads a DB; package signatures are not that
> different from any other field already there.

Alright. I'm not really worried, just wanted to discuss it now, before
someone comes to nag. To me it is fine and have advantages too.

A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
Q: Why is top posting so bad?

Denis A. Altoe Falqueto

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list