[pacman-dev] [PATCH 10/11] makepkg: do not ask sudo password twice

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Thu Jun 24 19:18:53 EDT 2010

On 25/06/10 02:58, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 24 Jun 2010 18:28 +0200, Cedric Staniewski wrote:
>> On 17.06.2010 17:09, Loui Chang wrote:
>>> On Fri 18 Jun 2010 00:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>> I think I have found the issue here.   We obviously have a NOPASSWD
>>>> entry in our sudoers file so "sudo -l" does not require a password.
>>>> So the bug is confirmed.  However the fix is not fully functional as
>>>> if I have sudo installed but can not use it for pacman, then I can
>>>> no longer fall back to using "su -c".  I'd choose excess password
>>>> typing over functionality loss.
>>> Why not just take sudo and asroot out of the equation and treat makepkg
>>> as a real non-handholding executable?
>> I'd like to add that "sudo -l" was never meant as hand-holding. The
>> intention was to support pacman-wrappers/replacements that aren't
>> supposed to be run as root because they have their own logic to call
>> pacman as root. The most prominent example would be yaourt, I guess.
>> But since this is broken due to the 'su -c' patch, I'm fine with
>> removing it again.
> Yeah it just kind of bothers me that makepkg is doing all these
> auxiliary functions like package installation, uninstallation, and
> permissions managment. It has lost its focus.

You know that dependency installation etc was a very, very early feature 
so how can makepkg have "lost its focus"?

> I think those things are better placed in outside scripts (like yaourt).
> It almost seems like the only thing stopping it from becoming another
> yaourt is that we've dubbed the AUR as untrusted.

So you use makepkg to update your system?

Seriously, if you are recommending that automatic dependency is removed 
from makepkg, you need to go away, do some more packaging and then 
reevaluate your opinion.


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list