[pacman-dev] [arch-general] Package signing

Denis A. Altoé Falqueto denisfalqueto at gmail.com
Thu May 6 03:34:01 CEST 2010

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On second thought, I think I've ripped apart my own branches on this
> very issue several times, so don't think that just any code is going
> to be good enough to get in. This is tricky stuff, especially when
> balancing being both non-obtrusive yet still secure.

I agree completely. The most we think about the issue, the better the
implementation. I am would like to wait more so that other people can
read the proposal and see failing points or suggest the missing parts

A: Because it obfuscates the reading.
Q: Why is top posting so bad?

Denis A. Altoe Falqueto

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list