[pacman-dev] Release plans

Andres P stderr at mail.com
Sat May 8 05:44:31 CEST 2010


On 05/05/10 at 18:31:22 CEST, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote: 
>>> 8*?) Tidy up bash_completion stuff? (FS#16630) 
> The poster disappeared and he tried to sneak a license change in 
> there, so that just hit a bit of a roadblock. I'd like to improve 
this 
> so I might just sit down and hack at it myself. 
 
"Tried to sneak a license change"? 
 
>From your own ml: 
 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Andres Perera <andres... at gmail.com> 
wrote: 
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Dan McGee <dpmc... at gmail.com> 
wrote: 
>>> Is this strictly necessary? You are changing one piece of code in 
the 
>>> entire codebase to require v3 or later and as weird as it sounds, I 
am 
>>> not going to let that fly. I won't be merging this unless it is v2 
or 
>>> you give some darn good reasons why we should move to v3. 
>> 
>> Not really necessary. You can change it to v2, or I can do that if 
it 
>> requires a commit from me. 
> 
> Nah that's good enough for me. I'll try to give this whole thing a 
> workout in the next day or two and see if I can come up with anything 
> else that we might want to tweak, however. 
> 
> -Dan 
 
http://www.mail-archive.com/pacman-dev@archlinux.org/msg04127.html 
 
Maybe I was a little harsh? 
 
Anyway, I don't care if you put a random bash script I wrote ages ago 
under GPL, Public Domain, BSD... 
 
lol, 
Andres P 

  


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list