[pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: Always resolve dependencies When --syncdeps is explicitly passed
Nezmer
arch at nezmer.info
Mon May 17 09:35:20 EDT 2010
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:29:30PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 11/05/10 05:30, Nezmer wrote:
> >This change makes sense for me in general. The use-case I ran into was
> >needing the dependencies when repackaging.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Nezmer<git at nezmer.info>
> >---
> > scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> >index a2db90b..34261b5 100644
> >--- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> >+++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> >@@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ if (( SOURCEONLY )); then
> > fi
> >
> > # fix flyspray bug #5973
> >-if (( NODEPS || NOBUILD || REPKG )); then
> >+if (( (NODEPS || NOBUILD || REPKG)&& ! DEP_BIN )); then
> > # no warning message needed for nobuild, repkg
> > if (( NODEPS )); then
> > warning "$(gettext "Skipping dependency checks.")"
>
>
> I think I would prefer something like:
>
> if (( NODEPS || ( ( NOBUILD || REPKG ) && !DEP_BIN ) )); then
>
> For NODEPS, we can safely skip installing deps if someone uses
> "--nodeps --syncdeps" because that person is an idiot!
There is no way to figure out what the (idiot) wants to exactly
accomplish, "--nodeps" or "--syncdeps". So If you feel "--nodeps"
carries more weight, then obviously your line should be used.
>
> I think REPKG should only installed deps when explicitly asked as a
> fair portion of the time installing deps will be unneeded.
Fairly asked by passing "--syncdeps" ?!
>
> Finally, I am not sure whether "--nobuild --syncdeps" is an OK
> combination. I think it is.
Of course It is.
Jemmy has no internet at home. He really needs to build a package. He
has to go to the Starbucks down the street in less than half an hour to
fetch dist files and dependencies and go back before the battery dies.
$ PACMAN="pacman --noconfirm" makepkg -so # and run!
>
> Sound fine?
Yes.
We are discussing a one-liner here. Should I copy off your line and resubmit ?
>
> Allan
>
Nezmer
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list