[pacman-dev] Issues with strip on package sources

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Fri Apr 8 08:20:53 EDT 2011


On 08/04/11 22:12, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:10:19PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 08/04/11 21:57, Mathew de Detrich wrote:
>>> A problem that seems to be occurring on packages (typically on AUR) where
>>> makepkg using gnu's strip causes the package building process to fail (since
>>> /usr/bin/strip terminates with a different error message) when there is an
>>> incompatible object file in the source. As an example with this current
>>> package (read the latest comments)
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31566
>>>
>>> It fails to build unless you add
>>> options=(!strip)
>>> into the PKGBUILD, which of course solves the problem in a bastardized way
>>> since it doesn't strip anything at all (and causes ridiculously bloated
>>> packages)
>>>
>>> In this case the problem seems to be that the source package contains an
>>> object file from a different architecture (x64) which when stripped, causes
>>> the strip to prematurely terminate (and thus the building of the package to
>>> fail)
>>>
>>> I looked through the man page for strip and there doesn't seem to be an
>>> option for it to continue stripping even if it hits an incompatible source
>>> file. The other option I guess would be to add more granularity (or another
>>> option) where you can provide a mask for objects not to be stripped (so you
>>> can do something like *64.so and any file matching that mask wont be
>>> stripped). Or you could manually invoke strip on every object file, and not
>>> terminate the makepkg process should it hit an "incompatible" object file
>>>
>>> In any case its an annoyance
>>>
>>
>> I can not be sure given no-one who hits this issue ever posts any
>> actual output...   but you are probably hitting this binutils issue:
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12632
>>
>>
>> But anyway, it appears the change from using a whitelist to choose
>> what files to strip to attempting to strip everything has caused
>> some packaging issues.  So I also think some way to blacklist
>> files/folders from being stripped would be useful.
>>
>> Allan
>>
>
> I think this is just a matter of strip encountering files that aren't of
> the architecture of the current system. qemu is a good example of where
> this fails:
>
> /usr/bin/strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
> `./usr/share/qemu/openbios-sparc32'
>
> and file reports this as...
>
> pkg/usr/share/qemu/openbios-sparc32: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC,
> version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, stripped
>
> These are files that are shipped precompiled and prestripped.
>

What does "file -bi" give on that file?


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list