[pacman-dev] trustdb locking issues and snippets from the apt changelog
Allan McRae
allan at archlinux.org
Sun Apr 24 09:25:52 EDT 2011
On 23/04/11 09:32, Dan McGee wrote:
> Allan and I today, and Denis in the past, noticed some issues with
> having a shared public key database and locking that gpg wants to do
> when reading from it. Here is an interesting bit from the apt
> changelog:
>
> apt (0.6.2) experimental; urgency=low
> * Provide apt-key with a secret keyring and a trustdb, even though we
> would never use them, because it blows up if it doesn't have them
>
>> From what I gather, they don't use the trustdb for the reasons we are
> seeing; instead it looks like they have another keyring named
> "trusted.gpg" and go forth with the assumption that everything in
> there is to be trusted.
>
Looking into this, I believe that we are hitting an entirely separate
issue. The reason for a lack of trustdb in the Debian case appears to
be more to do with keyring management that anything else.
The main issue here is that gpg(me) creates a lock file in the keyrings
home directory whenever it uses a keyring. Our keyring directory only
has write permissions for the root user and thus when pacman is not
being run as root (such as the "pacman -Qip <pkg>" case), it can not
create a lock file.
We can work around this by making the /etc/pacman.d/gnupg directory have
777 permissions. The {pubring,secring,trustdb},gpg files will
still have only root write permissions so I guess this is safe as long
as those files are created as part of the pacman package itself...
Also, unless I am missing something even if other files are added in
that directory by a user, they should not affect gpg. Still... 777
permissions on that directory sounds scary.
Anyway, doing this makes the signature validation with -Qip work for
non-root users (using Dan's gpg branch WIP patches).
Note that GPG itself has an option not to do locking (with a big warning
about that being bad...), and I thought maybe we could do that for the
non-root usage case, but it looks like gpgme can not do that.
Allan
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list