[pacman-dev] [PATCH] cachemoney: add new contrib script

Dave Reisner d at falconindy.com
Tue Aug 2 08:54:27 EDT 2011


On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:42:13AM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:42:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> On 01/08/11 02:15, Dave Reisner wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:47:03PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Do this script cover all or most of the features of these scripts?
> >> >>I'm sure the maintainers would be "happy" if there is a name
> >> >>conflict if the script we supply covers their functionality.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Time to re-review!
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> I agree with passing over those scripts snipped here...   I agree
> >> that the following two are really what this script is aiming to
> >> replace:
> >>
> >> >>>* clearcache
> >> >
> >> >bash4. Its nearly at feature parity with mine. Doesn't offer the same
> >> >level of output control or the ability to move packages. It's written by
> >> >DJ Mills, so this one actually works. It has the interesting approach of
> >> >extracting and parsing the .PKGINFO file from each .pkg.tar?(.*) so its
> >> >possibly more accurate, but very slow. This is the only one worth
> >> >talking about in comparison with mine.
> >>
> >> I guess the reading of .PKGINFO now is mostly redundant these days
> >> as the version is more completely specified with the addition of
> >> epoch instead of "force"  (which really made packages impossible to
> >> order...)
> >
> > The "bonus" is that you'll catch files not fitting my naming schema. I
> > think that this is somewhat of an odd case and not really required.
> >
> >> >>>* pacprune
> >> >
> >> >Late entry. Pat Brisbin's bash script which is meant to be mostly
> >> >utilitarian, but scores extremely high in that category. Doesn't,
> >> >however, offer the ability to do things like prune uninstalled packages
> >> >easily. Size calculations is possible for the crafty, but not inline
> >> >with another operation.
> >>
> >>
> >> From your description of these scripts, I think we should include
> >> your script in contrib.
> >>
> >> Minor comments:
> >>  - Add paccache (or whatever it is named...) to contrib/.gitignore
> >
> > done
> >
> >>  - Adjust "cachemoney - clean yo pacman cache, dawg"....
> >
> > already done.
> >
> >>  - whitespace:
> >> +     function parse_filename(filename,     parts, count, i, pkgname, arch) {
> >
> > Intentional awk-ism. You have no direct way of locally scoping a
> > variable except by declaring it as part of the function parameter list
> > (parameters are always optional). By convention, there's a chunk of
> > whitespace between "required" parameters and scoped variables.
> >
> >>  - Adjust "Bad dog, no biscuit. You will be prompted for privilege
> >> escalation."
> >
> > done.
> >
> >>  - is the ":" in front of the "a" right?
> >> +while getopts ':a:c:dfhi:k:m:rsuvz' opt; do
> >
> > Intentional. It causes getopts to squelch its own error reporting so
> > that I can do it myself.
> >
> >>  - it should also (re)move and .sig file alongside the package
> >>
> >
> > Yes, good point. Will implement this.
> >
> > In the meantime, I've also made the diskspace option the default, since
> > its only adding a single fork (and the stat call itself is fairly light
> > even for a thousand packages).
> 
> Damn- you're going to have to turn this into a patch as I just pushed
> a version from your repo. This is also the second time you have
> forgotten to update gitignore, young grasshopper.
> 
> -Dan
> 

I blame Allan.

d

P.S. patchcount++


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list