[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Revise siglevel_t, adding PACKAGE_HASH_OK field
Kerrick Staley
mail at kerrickstaley.com
Mon Jul 18 02:59:14 EDT 2011
And...
I didn't actually hit save, so this is missing the ALPM_SIG_ERROR
part. Here's the fixed version.
Revise siglevel_t, adding PACKAGE_HASH_OK field
The ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE_HASH_OK field indicates that secure hashes are to
be acceptable as signatures.
Also, having ALPM_SIG_USE_DEFAULT = (1 << 31) will cause alpm_siglevel_t
to be treated as an unsigned value on machines where int is 32 bits,
meaning negative numbers cannot be returned on error conditions. So,
make it (1 << 30). Still, there's no guarantee that signed
semantics will be used unless one of the enum values is negative. So,
supply ALPM_SIG_ERROR = -1 as a sort of dummy value (it can be used in
code, but "-1" is probably just as meaningful and is more consistent
with conventions used throughout the rest of the library).
Signed-off-by: Kerrick Staley <mail at kerrickstaley.com>
---
lib/libalpm/alpm.h | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
index 6e1e4bc..93ffa89 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
+++ b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
@@ -90,17 +90,19 @@ typedef enum _alpm_fileconflicttype_t {
* PGP signature verification options
*/
typedef enum _alpm_siglevel_t {
+ ALPM_SIG_ERROR = -1,
ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE = (1 << 0),
ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE_OPTIONAL = (1 << 1),
ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE_MARGINAL_OK = (1 << 2),
ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE_UNKNOWN_OK = (1 << 3),
+ ALPM_SIG_PACKAGE_HASH_OK = (1 << 4),
ALPM_SIG_DATABASE = (1 << 10),
ALPM_SIG_DATABASE_OPTIONAL = (1 << 11),
ALPM_SIG_DATABASE_MARGINAL_OK = (1 << 12),
ALPM_SIG_DATABASE_UNKNOWN_OK = (1 << 13),
- ALPM_SIG_USE_DEFAULT = (1 << 31)
+ ALPM_SIG_USE_DEFAULT = (1 << 30)
} alpm_siglevel_t;
/**
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list