[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Write mtree of package files to local database
allan at archlinux.org
Mon Feb 27 23:35:53 EST 2012
On 23/02/12 17:09, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> When installing a package, write an mtree of the package files into
>> the local database. This will be useful for doing validation of all
>> files on a system.
>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
>> Query: should we keep the info on .INSTALL and .CHANGELOG files? Changing a
>> .INSTALL file would be an interesting tactic, but if someone is doing that then
>> they can already adjust the mtree file...
>> Also, from http://goo.gl/Uq6X5 it appears that this could be made more efficient
>> by reusing the file descriptor, but I could not get that working after many, many,
>> many attempts.
> Did you rewind the file descriptor? You should just have to call
> `lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET)` first. Of course, since the current version
> of _alpm_open_archive does both the open() and archive_read_new()
> business, the abstraction there would have to change.
Ah... lseek was the key. I can do that and make the abstraction to
_alpm_open archive(). But it will not be needed if...
> With that said, not having to decompress everything twice would also
> be a win; I saw some chatter about this on IRC but I would definitely
> prefer to not iterate again; removing the iteration from the diskspace
> sped it up enough that I enabled that by default; I don't want to lose
> those gains.
I think this can be done. But it is far from simple. It involves us
doing an archive_read_data() to read the data into a buffer, duplicating
that buffer and then passing one copy to the archive_write_data() for
the file on disk and the other to the write for the mtree archive. It
means that we can not use the convenience function
archive_read_extract() and that is a big convenience...
A convenience function that wraps the corresponding
archive_write_disk(3) interfaces. The first call to
archive_read_extract() creates a restore object using
archive_write_disk_new(3) and archive_write_disk_set_standard_lookup(3),
then transparently invokes archive_write_disk_set_options(3),
archive_write_header(3), archive_write_data(3), and
archive_write_finish_entry(3) to create the entry on disk and copy data
into it. The flags argument is passed unmodified to
So we would have to duplicate that entire functionality...
>> + /* output the type, uid, gid, mode, size, time, md5 and link fields */
>> + archive_write_set_options(mtree, "use-set,!device,!flags,!gname,!nlink,!uname,md5");
> Did 'use-set' end up being a net-win on size and/or speed?
The size is much small for the raw file when using 'use-set' but that
difference entirely disappears when compressing with gzip. In the brief
tests I did, the reading was slightly faster using 'use-set'.
So, should I go ahead and write a version of archive_read_extract into a
function that does both the extraction and mtree creation? Or do people
see another way around this?
More information about the pacman-dev