[pacman-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] Add UpgradeSigLevel configuration option
Thomas Bächler
thomas at archlinux.org
Fri Jan 13 07:50:00 EST 2012
Am 13.01.2012 02:30, schrieb Allan McRae:
> So, any further comments on this before I take a stab at improving
> things further. So far the comments were:
>
> 1) distinguish between "pacman -U <url>" and "pacman -U <file>"
> 2) change name of option as "Upgrade" is confusing
>
> What about using:
> LocalFileSigLevel
> RemoteFileSigLevel
>
> Is RemoteFile too confusing with packages from repos?
>
> Allan
Might be. LocalUrlSigLevel and RemoteUrlSigLevel maybe? Some other word
that indicates that we use -U?
Personally, if we don't come up with anything better, I am okay with
{Local,Remote}FileSigLevel - just add a nice comment in the pacman.conf
template.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20120113/a5915246/attachment.asc>
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list