[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Provide full path names in warning messages
Richard Pougnet
richard at pougnet.ca
Sat Jan 26 21:16:25 EST 2013
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Martin Panter <vadmium+patch at gmail.com>wrote:
> On 26 January 2013 20:48, Richard Pougnet <richard at pougnet.ca> wrote:
> > Fix bug #31558 by printing filename instead of entryname
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Pougnet <richard at pougnet.ca>
> > ---
> > Resubmission to correctly extend the string onto two lines.
> > ---
> > lib/libalpm/add.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/libalpm/add.c b/lib/libalpm/add.c
> > index 57c9300..b5a537f 100644
> > --- a/lib/libalpm/add.c
> > +++ b/lib/libalpm/add.c
> > @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ static int extract_single_file(alpm_handle_t
> *handle, struct archive *archive,
> >
> > /* if a file is in NoExtract then we never extract it */
> > if(alpm_list_find(handle->noextract, entryname, _alpm_fnmatch)) {
> > - _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG, "%s is in NoExtract,
> skipping extraction\n",
> > - entryname);
> > + _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG, "%s is in NoExtract,
> skipping extraction \
> > + of %s\n", entryname, filename);
>
> Wouldn’t this be better as two separate adjacent strings? Otherwise
> you’ll end up with a giant space in the middle from the indentation.
> Something like
>
> _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG, "%s is in NoExtract,
> skipping extraction "
> "of %s\n", entryname, filename);
>
> > alpm_logaction(handle, "note: %s is in NoExtract,
> skipping extraction\n",
> > entryname);
> > archive_read_data_skip(archive);
> > @@ -222,20 +222,20 @@ static int extract_single_file(alpm_handle_t
> *handle, struct archive *archive,
> > /* if filesystem perms are
> different than pkg perms, warn user */
> > mode_t mask = 07777;
> > _alpm_log(handle,
> ALPM_LOG_WARNING, _("directory permissions differ on %s\n"
> > -
> "filesystem: %o package: %o\n"), entryname, lsbuf.st_mode & mask,
> > +
> "filesystem: %o package: %o\n"), filename, lsbuf.st_mode & mask,
> > entrymode &
> mask);
> > alpm_logaction(handle, "warning:
> directory permissions differ on %s\n"
> > - "filesystem: %o
> package: %o\n", entryname, lsbuf.st_mode & mask,
> > + "filesystem: %o
> package: %o\n", filename, lsbuf.st_mode & mask,
> > entrymode &
> mask);
> > }
> > _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG,
> "extract: skipping dir extraction of %s\n",
> > - entryname);
> > + filename);
> > archive_read_data_skip(archive);
> > return 0;
> > } else {
> > /* case 10/11: trying to overwrite dir
> with file/symlink, don't allow it */
> > _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_ERROR,
> _("extract: not overwriting dir with file %s\n"),
> > - entryname);
> > + filename);
> > archive_read_data_skip(archive);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > @@ -244,20 +244,20 @@ static int extract_single_file(alpm_handle_t
> *handle, struct archive *archive,
> > if(S_ISDIR(sbuf.st_mode)) {
> > /* the symlink on FS is to a directory,
> so we'll use it */
> > _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG,
> "extract: skipping symlink overwrite of %s\n",
> > - entryname);
> > + filename);
> > archive_read_data_skip(archive);
> > return 0;
> > } else {
> > /* this is BAD. symlink was not to a
> directory */
> > _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_ERROR,
> _("extract: symlink %s does not point to dir\n"),
> > - entryname);
> > + filename);
> > archive_read_data_skip(archive);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > } else if(S_ISREG(lsbuf.st_mode) && S_ISDIR(entrymode)) {
> > /* case 6: trying to overwrite file with dir */
> > _alpm_log(handle, ALPM_LOG_DEBUG, "extract:
> overwriting file with dir %s\n",
> > - entryname);
> > + filename);
> > } else if(S_ISREG(entrymode)) {
> > /* case 4,7: */
> > /* if file is in NoUpgrade, don't touch it */
> > --
> > 1.8.1.1
>
> Very true, I forgot about the added whitespace.
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list