[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Group optional dependencies by installation status

[Allan McRae]

On 12/07/13 16:06, Drew DeVault wrote:
>> What if we just did not print installed optional dependencies?
> I'm open to that idea, but hesitant to completely remove them. Maybe we
> can adjust the output of pacman -Si to include this status in the
> optional dep list?
> I'd like additional opinions for either of these changes.
> 

You mean -Qi?   And like we already do?