[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/3] pacdiff: improve speed, accuracy finding active configs using pacmandb

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Sun Jul 21 21:51:51 EDT 2013


On 22/07/13 11:36, Jonathan Frazier wrote:
> On 07/21/13 at 01:03pm, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 21/07/13 03:28, Jonathan Frazier wrote:
>>> On 07/20/13 at 12:30pm, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>> On 20/07/13 12:03, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:12:35AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/07/13 09:29, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +check_pacsave(){
>>>>>>>>> +	for f in "${1}" ${1}.[0-9]; do
>>>>>>> Strange that you quoted one of these but not the other. You're hitting
>>>>>>> the same 10+ pacsave problem here, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   for f in "$1"{,.+([0-9])}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question:  do we actually care about that?   Getting pacsaves with that
>>>>>> many suffixes actually takes quite a bit of effort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Allan
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't require a whole lot of effort to support -- I see no reason
>>>>> to implement the correct solution rather than a 90% solution.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK:
>>>>
>>>> @Jonathan: the "Search and ..." patch will need adjusted too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, I will rebase and send a v2. I have at least three of the 10
>>> patches I sent which need to be improved. I guess I buried the --help
>>> and option rework in a previous thread. So please review those if you
>>> haven't already.
>>>
>>> my todo list is:
>>> rename the pacmandb printing function
>>> remove expansion in arithmetic tests (option handling)
>>> fix spelling in pacmandb commit msg.
>>> fix some quoting of parameters
>>> match pacnew.[0-9]* files instead of pacnew.[0-9] in two patches
>>> implement updatedb question and execution.
>>>
>>
>> I added a couple of minor comments.
>>
>> Do you have somewhere you can push a repo with these patches?  It would
>> make it easier for me to pull them all, but I can manage if not.
>>
>> Allan
>>
>>
> 
> thanks, I reworked them and I think I got everything. I had to modify the
> pacmandb patch a bit more to work with the extra pacsaves so it may not
> be ideal. it is on github: https://github.com/JohnFrazier/pacman
> 
> let me know if you want me post the current version here.
> 

Please do.  I like all patches to be posted here before they are committed.

Allan




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list