[pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] Update the event callback
Allan McRae
allan at archlinux.org
Fri Jan 17 06:55:18 EST 2014
On 16/01/14 02:02, Simon Gomizelj wrote:
> I'm not the biggest fan how the casting is working here. We have various
> different structures we can send through now but they all need to be cast
> down and then manually cast back up. I think I'd rather have the base
> structure done as union then.
>
> But if we're going this far, why now consider going a little farther with
> this.
>
> The transaction events are handled in a loop but don't seem to require
> anything from the context of the loop. So there is no reason that they
> can't be reimplemented as callbacks.
I'm missing what you mean by this? What loop?
> And instead of having one callback function which does everything, we can
> introduce one for each of kind of event. The transaction can be seeded with
> a structure pointing to all the various callbacks. Then we start treating a
> transaction like an event loop.
>
> This would improve type safety since we don't have to cast anything
> anymore. This would improve readability since we don't have to rely on
> casts and heavy switch statements.
The disadvantage of requiring a callback for each event type is that it
requires a callback for each event type... At the moment, a new
frontend can just start providing a dummy event callback function and
gradually deal with the callbacks rather than having to provide many
functions immediately.
> Just an idea. Back on topic, I do like this change.
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list