[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/4] Revert refactoring in fa0c1e14
allan at archlinux.org
Sat Jun 28 21:51:33 EDT 2014
On 29/06/14 11:45, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:27:31AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> This will cause the code to break as soon as we handle another signal such
>> as SIGWINCH...
>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
>> Well... that didn't last long.
> Seems to me the thing to do is to declare a mapping between signum and
> handler, rather than declaring a signal handler for everything, and then
> littering the logic with if/else.
> I can send a patch on top of my SIGWINCH patch...
More information about the pacman-dev