[pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: remove ability to build individual packages
Pierre Neidhardt
ambrevar at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 14:20:45 UTC 2015
I might have missed something in the previous messages, but is there any
rationale on this, beside debatable worthiness?
On 15-09-23 00:04:23, Allan McRae wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
> ---
> scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> index 793d42c..6ededa3 100644
> --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ NOBUILD=0
> NODEPS=0
> NOEXTRACT=0
> PKGFUNC=0
> -PKGLIST=()
> PKGVERFUNC=0
> PREPAREFUNC=0
> REPKG=0
> @@ -1718,7 +1717,6 @@ usage() {
> printf -- "$(gettext " --noprepare Do not run the %s function in the %s")\n" "prepare()" "$BUILDSCRIPT"
> printf -- "$(gettext " --nosign Do not create a signature for the package")\n"
> printf -- "$(gettext " --packagelist Only list packages that would be produced, without PKGEXT")\n"
> - printf -- "$(gettext " --pkg <list> Only build listed packages from a split package")\n"
> printf -- "$(gettext " --printsrcinfo Print the generated SRCINFO and exit")\n"
> printf -- "$(gettext " --sign Sign the resulting package with %s")\n" "gpg"
> printf -- "$(gettext " --skipchecksums Do not verify checksums of the source files")\n"
> @@ -1808,7 +1806,6 @@ while true; do
> --nosign) SIGNPKG='n' ;;
> -o|--nobuild) NOBUILD=1 ;;
> -p) shift; BUILDFILE=$1 ;;
> - --pkg) shift; IFS=, read -ra p <<<"$1"; PKGLIST+=("${p[@]}"); unset p ;;
> --packagelist) PACKAGELIST=1 IGNOREARCH=1;;
> --printsrcinfo) PRINTSRCINFO=1 ;;
> -r|--rmdeps) RMDEPS=1 ;;
> @@ -2060,11 +2057,6 @@ elif [[ $SPLITPKG -eq 0 ]] && have_function package_${pkgname}; then
> SPLITPKG=1
> fi
>
> -if [[ -n "${PKGLIST[@]}" ]]; then
> - unset pkgname
> - pkgname=("${PKGLIST[@]}")
> -fi
> -
> # check if gpg signature is to be created and if signing key is valid
> if { [[ -z $SIGNPKG ]] && check_buildenv "sign" "y"; } || [[ $SIGNPKG == 'y' ]]; then
> SIGNPKG='y'
> --
> 2.5.3
--
Pierre Neidhardt
Q: Why was Stonehenge abandoned?
A: It wasn't IBM compatible.
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list