[pacman-dev] Why is FS#30993 still open?

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Mon Jan 11 04:24:33 UTC 2016

On 08/01/16 05:54, Alastair Hughes wrote:
> pacman can obviously be built statically, so I've probably missed the
> point; why is FS#30993 still open? What functionality is broken (if
> any) in the static version? I haven't found anything yet, but...

History lesson!

When building pacman, a "pacman-static" binary was created.  In Arch, it
was somewhat static...  This bug was opened not long after we stopped
building that.


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list