[pacman-dev] Aligning code variables - Was: Add alpm_pkg_get_makedepends and alpm_pkg_get_checkdepends

[Mark Weiman]

On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 14:09 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 09/12/16 12:17, Mark Weiman wrote:
> > -
> > -	.mtree_open      = _pkg_mtree_open,
> > -	.mtree_next      = _pkg_mtree_next,
> > -	.mtree_close     = _pkg_mtree_close,
> > -
> > -	.force_load      = _pkg_force_load,
> > +	.get_base         = _pkg_get_base,
> > +	.get_desc         = _pkg_get_desc,
> > +	.get_url          = _pkg_get_url,
> > +	.get_builddate    = _pkg_get_builddate,
> > +	.get_installdate  = _pkg_get_installdate,
> > +	.get_packager     = _pkg_get_packager,
> > +	.get_arch         = _pkg_get_arch,
> > +	.get_isize        = _pkg_get_isize,
> > +	.get_reason       = _pkg_get_reason,
> > +	.get_validation   = _pkg_get_validation,
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Is there any reason to keep this alignment given the churn whenever a
> field requires it to change?   I remember we go rid of this type of
> style in repo-add.
> 

It doesn't matter to me, I just wasn't sure if you wanted to conserve the
original formatting. If you would like me to change it, I can.

> A

Mark