[pacman-dev] [PATCH v2] Do not continuously try to open an invalid database
Dave Reisner
d at falconindy.com
Tue Jan 9 13:58:09 UTC 2018
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:07:13PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> If you manage to download a bad database (e.g. an html file when
> behind a proxy or with a badly configured webserver), pacman makes
> sure you know about it. Here is some example output:
>
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
> error: could not open file /var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db: Unrecognized archive format
>
> I don't know how many times that gets printed because it goes beyond my scrollback
> buffer.
>
> Flag a database that we can "open" and "fstat" but not read from as invalid to avoid
> this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
> ---
>
> Review of v1:
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2017-May/022027.html
>
> v2 - do much less stuff to achive the same result...
>
>
> lib/libalpm/be_sync.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/libalpm/be_sync.c b/lib/libalpm/be_sync.c
> index 1b7c8b6f..389e964c 100644
> --- a/lib/libalpm/be_sync.c
> +++ b/lib/libalpm/be_sync.c
> @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ static int sync_db_populate(alpm_db_t *db)
> fd = _alpm_open_archive(db->handle, dbpath, &buf,
> &archive, ALPM_ERR_DB_OPEN);
> if(fd < 0) {
> + db->status &= DB_STATUS_INVALID;
Given that DB_STATUS_INVALID is a single bit, shouldn't this be a simple
assignment? A bitwise 'and' here will result in the status remaining
invalid if it's already invalid, or zero'ing it out (DB_STATUS_VALID) if
it's some other set of bits. That doesn't seem like what we want.
Semi-related thought: it's a bit odd that we semantically chose "0" as
valid, and "1" as invalid.
> return -1;
> }
> est_count = estimate_package_count(&buf, archive);
> --
> 2.15.1
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list