Initial support for asignify signatures

[Jeremy Huntwork]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:41 AM Danilo <mail at dbrgn.ch> wrote:
> Is there a particular reason why you picked asignify?
> (The dependencies seem to be simpler, libsodium vs tweetnacl.)

Yeah, basically because it seemed simpler to integrate into pacman,
and had no external dependencies. Its API is very straightforward. I
looked at minisign as well and that too would be a fine solution. It
does seem like it has wider use.

JH