-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: arch-dev-public-bounces@archlinux.org [mailto:arch-dev-public- bounces@archlinux.org] Namens Pierre Schmitz Verzonden: maandag 17 december 2007 10:58 Aan: arch-dev-public@archlinux.org Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.23.11-1
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 08:43:53 schrieb Jan de Groot:
Looking at FS#8948 and FS#8949, I don't think it's wise to put this one into core.
This kernel is somehow broken. Are those alsa and cfs patches really needed? Afaik the vanilla kernel does not have those problems.
I wonder where this latest cfs scheduler patch comes from. The header says 2.6.23.8 v24, the filename says 2.6.23.11 v24 and the upstream site only has 2.6.23.9 v24. Was this .11 patch we have some hacked up 2.6.23.8 patch to compile with .11?