On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:26, Gerhard Brauer<gerhard.brauer@web.de> wrote:
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 01:31 +0300 schrieb Roman Kyrylych:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:22, Gerhard Brauer<gerhard.brauer@web.de> wrote:
Generally you're right, but this package contains only this commit: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=92cbc62e1c1b22c6...
I hope this commit was added too: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=28d34292a9a8... ;-)
That is a little confusing ;-) I never committed to initscripts, i sent a patch in FS#15263. I think Aaron wrote the commit and had a typo. In the modified initscripts 2009.03-2 we use my patch from the flyspray report.
I don't get it - the change exists in the core package anyway. What am I missing?
No, it's not in core (initscripts 2009.03-2).
Ah, I confused 2009.07 with 2009.03, Yeah, initscripts should move to core. I don't remember if I gave signoffs for the latest versions, but mkinitcpio, cryptsetup and initscripts are working fine here on x86_64. So here are my signoffs for them. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)