On Nov 27, 2007 3:04 PM, Aaron Griffin firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:33 PM, Paul Mattal email@example.com wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 7:33 AM, Paul Mattal firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
It seems we should support dump for filesystems we support. I'll take dump into core if desired. Or we could move xfsdump and dump both into extra.
I agree we should stay consistent, but how important are these apps? I know I've never used or heard of anyone using them. I'd guess they're recovery type tools, but we have a lot of those in extra already. Would anyone have a problem with both of them being in extra?
I think having both in extra would be fine. If someone moves xfsdump, I'll bring dump up from unsupported to extra and maintain it.
Done, moved xfsdump to extra.
xfsdump needs a rebuild to remove its groups entry, since it is no longer in base.