On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jason Chu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM, Simo Leone <simo@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:15:56PM -0800, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
it's been talked about it a bit. Jason said he is using ssmtp and he is willing to maintain it in extra. I was using msmtp but with mutt's new build in smtp (for those who havn't heard it b4, yes you heard right: mutt build in and smtp in one sentence) I don't use msmtp anymore. I don't say msmtp is a bad program. I just think we should ship maybe only one forwarder in extra and I'm fine with ssmtp. Anyone using nbsmtp at all?
Hmmm you know I was wondering why this thread was out of order in my mail reader... then I realized you sent it tomorrow.
Back on topic, thanks.
I say we keep msmtp and ssmtp, and remove nbsmtp - any problems with that? i will gladly maintain msmtp if no one wants it.
Whoops... now I feel dumb... I just realized that I use msmtp and not ssmtp.
At this point I don't really care what happens with ssmtp. So I vote for getting rid of ssmtp and nbsmtp. Objections? Oh and I can keep maintaining it. It was never really a hassle...
-T