On 01/29/2018 04:00 PM, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote:
I would like to hear as much feedback as possible. So don't be shy :) I want to give feedback to the microsoft guys in round about 1 week. I guess that should be enough to dicuss this topic.
I'd like to reiterate what everyone else seems to be saying: WSL is too fragile to offer real guarantees from our end, and AFAICT you're the only person who even wants to offer it in the first place. So I'm not sure what Arch Linux gets out of this. It seems like the only thing that would actually happen is that Microsoft gets to advertise that *we* support *them*, and then point people who complain at you. Having you "maintain" this, would seem to be a lot more complicated than maintaining docker or VM images, since both of the latter are at least compatible with basic things like glibc so only the packaging actually needs to be maintained. We cannot really say this about WSL, so you would have to be maintaining [core] as well. If people really want Arch Linux in WSL, they can do that today. It works, sort of, but it also pops up odd issues like the aforementioned glibc stuff. Do you have a plan for how you would work with Microsoft to get that fixed, without ultimately asking other Devs/TUs to aid in the process? Because this is the absolute minimum threshold for being able to actually say that we as a distro support WSL. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User