Thursday 24 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: | I've been testing various forms of the new logo for use in the | kernel framebuffer and I still think the best implementation is to | use no logo at all. The inherint disadvatange is that more and | more monitors are widescreen these days and that means the logo | proportions are distorted (short and wide) in the framebuffer | since standard vga settings use a 4:3 ratio. | | This is just my two cents of course, but I suggest that we remove | the logo from the framebuffer altogether. i'm against using no logo. either we use the linux 2.0 penguin or our official logo. how did you test it, what did you try? what was wrong besides wrong proportions (that can be fixed specifying the right size of screen to the fb)? if you need some help transforming the logo to look nice, let me know, - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><