On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:38:22 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote
The core thing won't happen for a bit though, as it's a bit more complex than everything else, but I figure if we can move non-core packages out of current, the rename will be fairly easy.
Wouldn't, then, everyone have to change pacman.conf to refer to core/os/i686? Or are we going to symlink it? If we're symlinking it, what's the point of the name change in the first place? :P Is this another one of those 'push it into a new pacman package, then wait a year and hope everyone's upgraded' kind of issues? (on a side note, I really have to start remembering to set my webmail to use the archlinux.org address when I send these things from here - I keep getting blocked awaiting approval 'cause I forget. :P) -- Travis