Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

Am 22.09.2012 10:07, schrieb Heiko Baums:

Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:09:02 +0900 schrieb Zhengyu Xu :

...

After updating systemd to 191-1 in testing repo, I had following messages during booting and the process was stuck (crashed).

[ 10.539416] systemd[1]: segfault at 7d ip b75a97b7 sp bfb0ece8 error 4 in libc-2.16.so[b752a000+1a4000] [ 10.539700] systemd[1]: Caught <SEGV>, core dump failed.

Downgrade to 189-4 can solve this problem. I want to know if this is a personal problem or a general bug affecting others as well.

Why am I not surprised?

Yes, binary init system is so much better than a script based init system. And Poetterix is so damn good, so advanced, such an evolution and so much better than the common and over 40 years well tested sysvinit.

Come on systemd fanboys, here you have the first example. There's more to come. I'll get my popcorn.

After the recent outbreaks, we have been discussing banning people from arch-general. At the time, the people we talked about had calmed down and everything went back to normal, so there was no point in going forward with it. However, your name just made top of the list. If I see you interrupting one more technical discussion with trolls and flames, you will be banned indefinitely without further notice. I will not see another one week flamewar on this list. You are a grown man (at least you look like one), so you should know that this kind of post adds nothing to the discussion, but starts yet another flamewar. Start acting like a grown man and keep it to yourself, unless you have something to say that's worth saying. I am completely against banning people, but at this point, it is either banning people or shutting down this list entirely.