On 11/12/2011 01:59 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee email@example.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz email@example.com wrote:
So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it locally using gpg --detach-sign <file> and then uploading the signature back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
Did something change WRT this workflow now? I'm getting signature-incorrect from commitpkg. I did sign like this 2 times before (opencv and cinelerra-cv), so it did work recently. gpg --verify outputs:
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
But this is normal, and the public key was not there for the previous 2 times. Or was gpg --verify not there in commitpkg before? Do I now need to import my public key on alderaan?
Is your key in your keychain on alderaan? Probably not from what this looks like. Easy to check- `gpg --list-keys 0xfoobar`.
Nope. That was what I was asking - whether I need to add it. The last 2 times that I pushed signed packages from alderaan I didn't do anything gpg-related remotely.
Anyway, imported the key now so all is good again.
-- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
don't import any key on alderaan.
He is trying to *verify*, meaning he needs his *public* key. This has nothing to do with signing or private keys. It make a heck of a lot more sense bandwidth-wise for him to upload the signature file to alderaan than upload both the package and signature from his local machine, so why should he not be able to do that? The `gpg --verify` call is there to make sure developers don't accidentally upload mismatched packages and corresponding signature files, which could easily happen when doing test builds and --nosign, etc.
well, i understood that he signed the package on alderaan...