[arch-dev-public] 2007.11-0.3 TEST ISO, 1 week signoff
Hi i just placed the new "Core Dump" TEST ISO to the mirrors: ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/rc-iso/2007.11/ 1 week testing should be enough, I tested them in kvm-qemu and didn't find an issue. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8435 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8431 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8422 - added some genpatches from gentoo - added fix for 2 ide modules in pair mode - added fix for zd1211rw oops greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
Hey, I did a test install of 2007.10-0.2 and it installed fine except for a few minor nits: * My hd came up as sda instead of the usual hda. Which module pata or ide is recommended or does it not matter? * Did you mean to say "lowmem image for <=64M" on the isolinux splash? * The hwdetect install feature packed my MODULES=() line with snd_* modules which I thought was funny. Hardware info if you care: ----- 00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) 00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3) 00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) 00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) 00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2) 00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) 00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce 6600] (rev a2) ---- Thanks, k On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:08 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi i just placed the new "Core Dump" TEST ISO to the mirrors: ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/rc-iso/2007.11/
1 week testing should be enough, I tested them in kvm-qemu and didn't find an issue.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8435 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8431 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8422
- added some genpatches from gentoo - added fix for 2 ide modules in pair mode - added fix for zd1211rw oops
greetings tpowa
_______________________________________________ arch-dev-public mailing list arch-dev-public@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public -- K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb K. Piche:
Hey,
I did a test install of 2007.10-0.2 and it installed fine except for a few minor nits: why not -0.3?
* My hd came up as sda instead of the usual hda. Which module pata or ide is recommended or does it not matter? hmm seems you havent installed since .19 kernels ;) thats normal and hwdetect will add the correct module for you
* Did you mean to say "lowmem image for <=64M" on the isolinux splash? no, recommended are 64 and more because i cannot tell ya if it works with less memory and without swap space and all packages selected to install, becaus of the well known oom_killer in pacman.
* The hwdetect install feature packed my MODULES=() line with snd_* modules which I thought was funny. that is also since a long time to avoid sound issues and keep the order of sound cards, normal behviour.
thanks for testing, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 07:28 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb K. Piche:
Hey,
I did a test install of 2007.10-0.2 and it installed fine except for a few minor nits: why not -0.3?
Just the timing of the download. I burned the CD and then 0.3 came out. I'll try it in qemu.
* My hd came up as sda instead of the usual hda. Which module pata or ide is recommended or does it not matter? hmm seems you havent installed since .19 kernels ;) thats normal and hwdetect will add the correct module for you
Give or take the testing repo I'm always up to date! :) On my regular system: [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ pacman -Q kernel26 kernel26 2.6.23.1-6 [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ and HOOKS="base udev autodetect ide filesystems" gives me hda. The ISO uses pata hook which gives sda. Obviously my mkinitcpio.conf is old. I'm still curious as to what the recommended module is...
* Did you mean to say "lowmem image for <=64M" on the isolinux splash? no, recommended are 64 and more because i cannot tell ya if it works with less memory and without swap space and all packages selected to install, becaus of the well known oom_killer in pacman.
I just mean that on first read it sounded like: "if you have 64M or more use the low memory image". Maybe it's just me.
* The hwdetect install feature packed my MODULES=() line with snd_* modules which I thought was funny.
that is also since a long time to avoid sound issues and keep the order of sound cards, normal behviour.
Cool, then it looks good to me.
thanks for testing, greetings tpowa
_______________________________________________ arch-dev-public mailing list arch-dev-public@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public -- K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>
2007/10/30, K. Piche <kpiche@rogers.com>:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 07:28 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
* My hd came up as sda instead of the usual hda. Which module pata or ide is recommended or does it not matter? hmm seems you havent installed since .19 kernels ;)
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb K. Piche: thats normal and hwdetect will add the correct module for you
Give or take the testing repo I'm always up to date! :) On my regular system: [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ pacman -Q kernel26 kernel26 2.6.23.1-6 [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ and HOOKS="base udev autodetect ide filesystems" gives me hda.
The ISO uses pata hook which gives sda. Obviously my mkinitcpio.conf is old. I'm still curious as to what the recommended module is...
pata -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
K. Piche schrieb:
Give or take the testing repo I'm always up to date! :) On my regular system: [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ pacman -Q kernel26 kernel26 2.6.23.1-6 [22:50 kpiche@puffin ~]$ and HOOKS="base udev autodetect ide filesystems" gives me hda.
The ISO uses pata hook which gives sda. Obviously my mkinitcpio.conf is old. I'm still curious as to what the recommended module is...
We use pata as the default, because in the future, there will be no ide anymore (althought that may take another year or two). However, pata_sis is still experimental and I use the ide driver on my desktop for stability reasons. Some older Intel chipsets had problems in earlier versions, but I think those should all be fine now in 2.6.23. The rule is: If there are strange messages during the boot process with pata or access seems slow, use ide. Otherwise, use pata.
participants (4)
-
K. Piche
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Thomas Bächler
-
Tobias Powalowski