[arch-dev-public] filesystem 2008.03 bump with small change?
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697 can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0 thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
2008/3/5, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
looks reasonable -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
2008/3/5, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com>:
2008/3/5, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
looks reasonable
I wonder if you guys would accept an addition of "iocharset=utf8" (we use utf8 by default, but default fstab makes rendering non-latin filenames incorrect. (see the other request on bugtracker for similar thing in gconf) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like: /dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0 Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount as a user, you probably want "users" in there
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount as a user, you probably want "users" in there
auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the mount options. -Dan
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount as a user, you probably want "users" in there
auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the mount options.
-Dan
so what to do now? changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8? or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697
can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount as a user, you probably want "users" in there
auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the mount options.
-Dan
so what to do now? changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8? or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use?
Ah, ignore me - Dan found my confusion - apparently I can't read that well. Yes, I am fine with the changes. Regarding the other iocharset and whatnot changes... I think we're getting way too specific here. The fstab should have sane defaults but not try to cover all bases. If our users don't know how to edit a file, then we got bigger problems.
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>
wrote:
> Hi > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697 > > can i change fstab to: > /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto > ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd > /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 > /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 > 0
Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are we adding unhide?
Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look like:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks.
Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount as a user, you probably want "users" in there
auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the mount options.
-Dan
so what to do now? changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8? or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use?
Ah, ignore me - Dan found my confusion - apparently I can't read that well. Yes, I am fine with the changes. Regarding the other iocharset and whatnot changes... I think we're getting way too specific here. The fstab should have sane defaults but not try to cover all bases. If our users don't know how to edit a file, then we got bigger problems.
ok i'll checkin then, with the auto fs type only :) greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
2008/3/5, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>:
so what to do now? changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8? or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use?
Devs that use latin charset might thought this is unimportant, but IMO this would be a good change, because it will make mounting consistent with our default for UTF-8 locales. Also see http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7549 for the similar request for Gnome (I don't know if KDE needs that too). In addition, I request adding /etc/modprobe.d/ to the package. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
In addition, I request adding /etc/modprobe.d/ to the package.
Wha? Why doesn't that belong with the packages that provides /etc/modprobe.conf... or even modprobe itself (same package, by the way)?
2008/3/6, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
In addition, I request adding /etc/modprobe.d/ to the package.
Wha? Why doesn't that belong with the packages that provides /etc/modprobe.conf... or even modprobe itself (same package, by the
oops, I've totally forgot about module-init-tools, shame on me :-( -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
participants (5)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Tobias Powalowski
-
Travis Willard